Your intake bot talks to clients. Your carrier has questions.
The carrier conversation has changed. In EPIC’s 2026 survey of lawyers’ professional liability insurers, a majority of responding carriers reported seeing claims involving AI use, and most malpractice carriers now ask about AI at intake or renewal. Willis Towers Watson’s 2026 outlook describes the same structural shift: affirmative coverage increasingly conditioned on documented AI governance.
If your law firm runs intake bots, AI receptionists, and after-hours chat on your website, the question at renewal is no longer whether you use AI — it’s whether you can document how it’s governed.
- An intake bot that characterizes the merits of a matter has given legal advice.
- A missed statute-of-limitations mention is a missed deadline conversation.
- A fee quote your bot improvised is a fee dispute waiting for a file number.
A date-ranged, hash-stamped governance report generated from an append-only record: which AI touches client intake, what rules it is held to (no-legal-advice boundary, conflict-check escalation, fee-quote integrity), what it actually said, and what you did about exceptions.
Generated on demand from Settings → Governance. Every generation is itself ledgered — the pack has chain of custody.
Running in minutes, not quarters.
Paste one URL into your agent platform — or auto-forward its summary emails — and Anzuna starts keeping the record. A starter rulebook written for law firms loads at onboarding (10 sections: no legal advice, confidentiality, conflict check before engagement, and more), written as a starting point — review it with your compliance advisor.
The Practice plan — $499/month flat, unlimited agents — includes the Evidence Pack, the vertical rulebook, and governance exports.
Full features · no card · we work for the business being represented, no one else